Torture, Consequentialism and Tainted Goods

Wednesday, 23rd November 2011 - 09:11
scene from the tv-series "24"

scene from the tv-series "24"

Those who defend torture normally do so on consequentialist grounds. They posit cases such as the “ticking time bomb” in which the harm done by torture is insignificant compared to the good it does. The consequences of torture are clearly beneficial, overall: OK, it does some harm to an individual terrorist who has hidden the bomb but at the same time it saves thousands or millions of lives. When so many lives are at stake, a utilitarian calculus will clearly show that the good that will follow from torture outweighs the good that will follow from the refusal to torture. (...)

Read the original article...

  • Print
  • email
  • PDF
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Diigo
  • FriendFeed
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon


stay updated

   

Daily updates via Email: